21st January 2010 
Tilting the global warming story the major media? As a matter of course, FOCUS reported recently about a possible glaciation
Now and then I heard the statement is that critics of the CO 2-greenhouse theory would be instructed by powerful industrialists and paid to enforce their interests. About the oil and automobile manufacturers.
Sure, there are such people: people and media that are for sale. Those which can be used for the (lower) motives of others. We know this not only since the dispute climate that values the understanding of many contemporaries a rather strange seems to be (if one exists at all).
From now derive all the questioning of the "man-made climate change" was staged artificial, is groundless and is evidence of poor research.
Should that eventually this assumption also the "zeitgeist", and I can tell you as publisher assure received at any time even a penny in grants, let alone a relevant unfair offer. Not even a display of an energy company "lost" in our magazine. Probably better that way, it would have turned me into this debate, probably from a rope.
Let's turn the tables around once. Who really benefits from the prevailing climate dogma, asked Michael Limburg, justifiably in the zeitgeist-post " The climate crisis - a chronicle is tearing mass hysteria ". Where does the coveted research funding from federal, state and EU? For example, at institutions such as the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) with its leader, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, frequent guest on talk shows. Schellnhuber knows how to stir up fears. He must also, after all, he has secured in this way public funds ( which account for about half of the institute budget, the other 50% are, according to the press office of external funding coming from project orders). And on which it depends. The PIK has 250 employees who wish to have their salaries paid on time.
Or take the so-called IPCC, the IPCC. Most people who deal with the whole circus only superficial air go out still assume that this is a neutral institution, but this does not justify (more background information in zeitgeist-issue 1-2009 ). Messages like the gesture-engined to melting of glaciers show once again that the IPCC assumes climate data incorrect or unverified or (intentionally or unintentionally?) misuses.
As for me personally in dealing with these and other topics guides and directs, is zuallervorderst common sense. Lately it seems also in the editorial offices of the two major German news magazines on this miraculous ability to reflect our thinking apparatus. First, the MIRROR, on 16 November in an article ( "The weakening at the Sun") finds that the average global temperature for ten years is no longer rising. For ten years, mind you! Why then please report it until now this fact? And by the way: Should the post title is not conclusive enough, called "The weakening at the climate sinner"? Why now all of a sudden the sun comes into play, where she was but played down by officials as the cause of climate change ever?
With issue No. 2/2010 then moved to the Focus, the same question on the cover: "If from the climate catastrophe," Here is a moment to the sun in the center of the coverage (if the editors probably the zeitgeist articles by Oliver Janich inspired, who recently also for the publication of a critical article about the 11th September in FOCUS MONEY responsible?) and not the man, the cows, or other supposed villains climate. At the same time is explained in the FOCUS issue a new cold period likely. Who remembers the "real weather expert," the CIA said in the 1970s, a new ice age ahead . Given the recent snow chaos for many lay observer an entirely plausible scenario. That in turn hides behind a familiar pattern, documented by a report of the Accu-channels .
Even now, science areas, which held out so far, albeit from the whole climate change debate, relate critical position, such as on the occasion of the Congress "Climate of the Earth system," the geologists will hold, the mainstream for a while the old paradigm. This is demonstrated by the fact that the air gate scandal is not the scientists are persecuted, who had been guilty of data falsification, but only the "hacker", which he uncovered, and even of "British anti-terrorist investigators and extremism units" .
Tension remains, however, whether politicians know to exploit the "Ice Age Fear" and soon as a new climate religion preach.
Perhaps HERE less about climate, as a diversionary tactic - distracted by things to which one would really make an impact - such as the current economic conditions.
This whole climate of hysteria was beginning to now nothing but a confusion, a consciously made a lie.
What should always be achieved is not ultimately prove.
Money plays a role in any case.
Tax certificates uswRegelungen-all types.
True or not true, what interests you the that live on it and deliver the expected loyal and relevant reports - by default.
The alleged scientists who live on creams, from here. where is the path of honor and pride of the scientist? Again-confidence.
The climate is the biggest lie Verarschung for at least a generation-the-century lie.
No one can "make" the climate and affect it either. For other forces in the universe are in charge.
Environmental protection, yes, this has nothing to do with climate change. Air pollution and air pollution, that is people power.
If a climate change comes, it comes, no matter how cold or warm, we just need to adjust it.
Slowly you get the assurance that we are being lied to and cheated on all areas, sold and betrayed out-of-plain around the nose and ripped easily.